Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Weapons"

From Cantr II Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Scratch pad)
(Moved all my clutter to my clutterbox. It can be brought back here if it's really needed, but I think it's just taking up space here.)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Care should be taken with some of these rankings. Whilst a more effective weapon appears higher  than a less effective weapon, in the weapon selection list, many weapons and tools have the same base effectiveness. In such cases the rank order is determined by when that type of weapon/tool was added to the game . So strictly speaking the ">" signs should really read ">="
 
Care should be taken with some of these rankings. Whilst a more effective weapon appears higher  than a less effective weapon, in the weapon selection list, many weapons and tools have the same base effectiveness. In such cases the rank order is determined by when that type of weapon/tool was added to the game . So strictly speaking the ">" signs should really read ">="
 
--[[User:Chris Johnson|Chris Johnson]] 05:01, 30 Nov 2005 (EST)
 
--[[User:Chris Johnson|Chris Johnson]] 05:01, 30 Nov 2005 (EST)
 
 
==Scratch pad==
 
It's getting to be a pain figuring out which rankings are reliable. I'm listing all the sources the information came from. Don't touch them. [[User:Sho|Sho]] 19:32, 23 Dec 2005 (EST)
 
 
----
 
IRC: 10/18/05
 
*(21:28:05) AngelSpice: a bone bagh-nagh is better than a primitive bow is better than a bone club.
 
*(21:31:19) Surly: Battle Axe>sabre>dungfork>sledgehammer>carving knife>chisel>screwdriver
 
*(21:32:29) Surly: Claymore>sabre>pickaxe>knife>fishing spear>screwdriver
 
*(21:33:03) AngelSpice: sabre>longbow>knife>shovel.
 
*(21:34:30) Surly: crossbow>sabre>pickaxe>sickle>knife>screwdriver>shovel
 
----
 
Sho's memory:
 
*[[Claymore]]>[[Steel long sword]]>[[Steel broad sword]]>[[Steel sabre]]>[[Composite recurve bow]]>[[Longbow]]>[[Bone spear]]>[[Bone club]]>Bare fist
 
*[[Steel battle axe]]>[[steel broad sword]]
 
*[[Crossbow]]>[[steel sabre]]
 
*[[Steel battle axe]]>[[steel broad sword]]
 
*[[Crossbow]]>[[steel sabre]]
 
*[[Steel sabre]]>[[longbow]]
 
*[[Diamond encrusted steel sabre]]>[[steel sabre]]
 
*[[Pickaxe]]>[[steel bagh-nakh]]
 
----
 
Added by Talapus:
 
*[[Compound bow]] > [[Steel sabre]]
 
*[[Steel bastard sword]] > [[Steel rapier]]
 
*[[Steel rapier]] > [[Steel mace]]
 
*[[Steel mace]] > [[Sledge hammer]]
 
*[[Axe]] > [[Sledge hammer]]
 
*[[Sledge hammer]] > [[Bone knife]]
 
*[[Bone club]] > [[Targe]]
 
*[[Sledge hammer]] > [[Targe]]
 
*[[Targe]] > [[Chisel]]
 
*[[Chisel]] > [[Screwdriver]]
 
*[[Chisel]] > [[Shovel]]
 
*[[Bone knife]] > [[Waster]]
 
*[[Longbow]]>[[Axe]]>[[Atlatl]]>[[Bone club]]>[[Bone knife]]>[[Chisel]]>[[Carving Knife]]>Bare fist
 
*[[Crossbow]]>[[Claymore]]
 
----
 
Post on this talk page:
 
I reaffirm that the Chisel is more powerful then the Carving Knife. I have a character with both. [[User:Talapus|Talapus]] 12:30, 28 Nov 2005 (MTN)
 
----
 
Added by Wojd:
 
*[[crossbow]] > [[steel battle axe]] > [[claymore]] > [[steel bastard sword]] > [[steel sabre]] > [[steel rapier]] > [[pickaxe]] > [[axe]] > [[dung-fork]] > [[knife]] (steel) > [[apache throwing star]] > [[primitive bow]] > [[bone club]] > [[whip]] > [[targe]] > [[sledgehammer]] > [[carving knife]] > [[iron chisel]] > [[screwdriver]] > [[shovel]] > [[waster]] > [[stick]] > bare fist</nowiki>
 

Revision as of 05:43, 24 December 2005

Possible inconsistency: In Talapus's revision, the main ranking has chisel over carving knife, while one of the other chains has iron carving knife over iron chisel. Sho 02:25, 28 Nov 2005 (EST)

I reaffirm that the Chisel is more powerful then the Carving Knife. I have a character with both. Talapus 12:30, 28 Nov 2005 (MTN)

Care should be taken with some of these rankings. Whilst a more effective weapon appears higher than a less effective weapon, in the weapon selection list, many weapons and tools have the same base effectiveness. In such cases the rank order is determined by when that type of weapon/tool was added to the game . So strictly speaking the ">" signs should really read ">=" --Chris Johnson 05:01, 30 Nov 2005 (EST)