Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unana"

From Cantr II Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
("Stamp of Approval")
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Do you think maybe the different languages ought to have different wikis, instead of being on the same pages?
+
Is this top-ten really necessary? I think it's pointless information and definitely not main page stuff ... why not move it to 'current events' or something? Or to a page about the Wiki?
 +
--[[User:Jos Elkink|Jos Elkink]] 05:51, 3 Nov 2005 (EST)
  
−
--[[User:Nick Roberts|Nick Roberts]] 20:30, 12 Jul 2005 (EDT)
+
: No, that's fair enough. I was attempting to show the active editing community that we appreciate the work they're putting in. This really should go in 'Community portal', which as Sho suggested "the idea is that the "wiki community" means the people who go there often and edit", with reference to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_Portal Wikipedia version]. And just for clarity, do you debate its placement here, or that ''and'' its existence? -- [[User:Kabl00ey|Kabl00ey]] 21:22, 3 Nov 2005 (EST)
  
−
I agree.
+
: I don't think it's very useful, so in that sense I was debating it's existence, but I don't really care one way or the other. The placement was my main objection. --[[User:Jos Elkink|Jos Elkink]] 13:49, 5 Nov 2005 (EST)
−
--[[User:Creepyguyinblack|Creepyguyinblack]] 04:50, 13 Jul 2005 (EDT)
 
  
−
I changed it.
+
==International Emotes link==
 +
I have added a link, as requests keep coming up on the forums about how to deal with meetings between characters of different language groups. I have used this before, and assume that its presence on the Cantr wiki means it is a legitimate tool, but as far as I'm aware, dictionaries are a no-no, hence the disclaimer.
 +
A formal decision/formal guidance by staff on how to deal with 'international' meetings in Cantr would be appreciated (and is oft-requested)--[[User:Hallucinatingfarmer|Hallucinatingfarmer]] 11:33, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
  
−
--[[User:Jos Elkink|Jos Elkink]] 05:08, 13 Jul 2005 (EDT)
 
  
−
Would it be possible to make a true multi-language setup, similar to Wikipedia's? I don't know what's involved in making that work (I have a suspicion that it's not feasile here), but it's kind of annoying when half of the time [[Special:Random]] brings up a Polish page; also crosslinking articles is rather inelegant with the current system. [[User:68.174.2.227|68.174.2.227]]
+
Emoting can be done in any language and there is not a limit on sources. However, your chars may only speak or understand their spawn language or those learned in game. Many players outside of the English Zone emote well in English, so gesturing is a good way to try to communicate in cross-zone meetings and is not discouraged. -Sanczez
  
−
== Categories and templates ==
+
== No Russian version. ==
  
−
It would make things a lot neater if we could use categories and templates to standardize the presentation of items and such. Virtually all of the information in here right now is begging to be categorized. I can't do it myself, not having any experience actually creating those, but does anyone else? [[User:Sho|Sho]]
+
I am appalled to find out that we don't have a page for over 200 million potential players. I took the liberty of setting up a very basic page (it's just a translation of the English one right now, plase add it to the index.
−
* I'm putting the vehicles in a category system. This will eventually mean tearing down the [[Vehicle]] page, but for now I'll just make nondestructive changes. [[User:Sho|Sho]]
+
http://www.cantr.net/mwiki/index.php/Russkaja_versija
  
−
== Agglomeration vs. subdivision ==
+
The link has been added to the main page index. The wiki is a community run project, it's up to Russian players to translate and flesh out the Russian sections. --[[User:Chris Johnson|Chris Johnson]] 11:49, 30 October 2007 (EST)
−
 
 
−
Some categories of items, such as [[tools]], have all of their elements listed on the same page. Others, such as [[resources]], have separate pages for everything. My gut instinct (as a Wikipedian) is to split everything into separate pages and use categories to tie them together, but I can see why we might want to keep things in big metapages - it's similar to the format found in IC guides, often the individual data aren't big enough for individual articles, and it would be loads of unrewarding data-entry grunt work. Anyone have any opinion? [[User:Sho|Sho]]
 
−
 
 
−
== To Do List for Admins (jelkink and Jos Elkink, ha) ==
 
−
 
 
−
* Deal with orphan pages - I've eliminated a bunch, but there are still a lot of pages that need deleting, which I can't do. [[User:Sho|Sho]]
 
−
* Decide on standards - stuff like capitalization and hyphenation has been causing some trouble with duplicate pages. [[User:Sho|Sho]]
 
−
* It's not clear how much of the stuff here is data from Programming or Resources Department people (and therefore probably complete and correct) and how much is contributions from players like me (and therefore likely to need verification). For example, I'm not sure how much to trust the data on the ability of certain boat types to dock to each other; I feel that it looks like some types were left out, but I can't be sure. Some way of, say, putting a stamp of approval on information would be excellent. [[User:Sho|Sho]]
 
−
* Ban the following IPs for spam: 69.152.35.94 24.202.53.171 68.75.27.99 66.72.161.240 [[User:Sho|Sho]]
 
−
 
 
−
== "Stamp of Approval" ==
 
−
 
 
−
A good idea would be to add notes into the discussion pages stating the information added and from what department.
 
−
 
 
−
Personally, I've added the information for vehicles and animals, and so should be 99.9% accurate.
 

Latest revision as of 07:09, 17 August 2009

Is this top-ten really necessary? I think it's pointless information and definitely not main page stuff ... why not move it to 'current events' or something? Or to a page about the Wiki? --Jos Elkink 05:51, 3 Nov 2005 (EST)

No, that's fair enough. I was attempting to show the active editing community that we appreciate the work they're putting in. This really should go in 'Community portal', which as Sho suggested "the idea is that the "wiki community" means the people who go there often and edit", with reference to the Wikipedia version. And just for clarity, do you debate its placement here, or that and its existence? -- Kabl00ey 21:22, 3 Nov 2005 (EST)
I don't think it's very useful, so in that sense I was debating it's existence, but I don't really care one way or the other. The placement was my main objection. --Jos Elkink 13:49, 5 Nov 2005 (EST)

International Emotes link

I have added a link, as requests keep coming up on the forums about how to deal with meetings between characters of different language groups. I have used this before, and assume that its presence on the Cantr wiki means it is a legitimate tool, but as far as I'm aware, dictionaries are a no-no, hence the disclaimer. A formal decision/formal guidance by staff on how to deal with 'international' meetings in Cantr would be appreciated (and is oft-requested)--Hallucinatingfarmer 11:33, 23 July 2007 (EDT)


Emoting can be done in any language and there is not a limit on sources. However, your chars may only speak or understand their spawn language or those learned in game. Many players outside of the English Zone emote well in English, so gesturing is a good way to try to communicate in cross-zone meetings and is not discouraged. -Sanczez

No Russian version.

I am appalled to find out that we don't have a page for over 200 million potential players. I took the liberty of setting up a very basic page (it's just a translation of the English one right now, plase add it to the index. http://www.cantr.net/mwiki/index.php/Russkaja_versija

The link has been added to the main page index. The wiki is a community run project, it's up to Russian players to translate and flesh out the Russian sections. --Chris Johnson 11:49, 30 October 2007 (EST)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php?title=Talk:Unana&oldid=34412"