Difference between revisions of "User talk:Altotn"
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Si nos fijamos en http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php/Cantr_II_Wiki:Sandbox/page5 y la sección para la fabricación, tenemos que tener tanto la maquinaria y otros recursos, ¿no? ¿O poner la maquinaria en la sección de métodos? | Si nos fijamos en http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php/Cantr_II_Wiki:Sandbox/page5 y la sección para la fabricación, tenemos que tener tanto la maquinaria y otros recursos, ¿no? ¿O poner la maquinaria en la sección de métodos? | ||
--[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 12:49, 25 February 2010 (GMT) | --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 12:49, 25 February 2010 (GMT) | ||
| + | : Never mind, I got it now. Thanks! :) --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 12:56, 25 February 2010 (GMT) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Is it possible to alter table rows in the tables in templates? So, e.g.: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 style="border-collapse:collapse" width="400px" | ||
| + | |- bgcolor=#cff | ||
| + | ! Methods of manufacturing !! Amount | ||
| + | |-bgcolor=#fff | ||
| + | | [[oven]]<br />(400g [[pastry dough]], 150g [[sugar]], 30g [[wood]]) | ||
| + | | 550 | ||
| + | |-bgcolor=#eee | ||
| + | | [[coal oven]]<br />(480g [[pastry dough]], 180g [[sugar]], 30g [[coal]]) | ||
| + | | 660 | ||
| + | |-bgcolor=#fff | ||
| + | | [[coal oven]]<br />(480g [[pastry dough]], 180g [[sugar]], 55g [[charcoal]]) | ||
| + | | 660 | ||
| + | |-bgcolor=#eee | ||
| + | | [[gas oven]]<br />(800g [[pastry dough]], 300g [[sugar]], 20g [[propane]]) | ||
| + | | 1100 | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | It would also be nice if the Amount-column was right aligned. What do you think? --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 13:58, 13 April 2010 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat| and so on. --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST) | ||
| + | :: I think you misunderstand me. I would like this for existing templates (Resources mainly), not a new template. We would have to edit all articles again to use this new template, while if we could set background color on method1, amount1, method3, amount3 and so on, it would solve the problem. I think it would be good if new templates looked as much as the old ones as possible. It's really a nuciance to have to change every article to method0 instead of method1 etc. :) --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 08:46, 15 April 2010 (IST) | ||
| + | ::: Sorry, my mistake. I was tired and stressed. It looks very good now. :) --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 14:02, 16 April 2010 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Deleting redirect pages== | ||
| + | Hi! Could you please make sure that the links are corrected before marking a redirect page for deletion? 'What links here' shouldn't have any resulting pages. Thanks! :) --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 09:57, 18 May 2010 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Re:Vehicle template== | ||
| + | Hi. | ||
| + | I am updating the vechicles to the new format with the stackable infoboxes as in the new template. | ||
| + | The old bike had a parameter called single with a number like a weight after it. Please, do you know what this is in the new template? | ||
| + | Thankyou, --[[User:Addicted|addicted]] 15:07, 16 December 2010 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thankyou that was clear. But I'm not sure what you mean by merging - (If you are updating the template "Infobox:Land vehicle", keep in mind that you could take the opportunity to merge it with the template "Infobox:Ship"). The two infobox templates (ship and land vehicle) are the same. Please look at Bike and see if it is correct. Thanks. --[[User:Addicted|addicted]] 01:32, 17 December 2010 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:32, 17 December 2010
Re: Interwiki
That works great. Thanks for your help. Now lets see if I have the energy to add it everywhere. :) --EchoMan 11:58, 5 February 2010 (GMT)
Re: New template
If you look at http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php/Cantr_II_Wiki:Sandbox/page5 and the section for Manufacturing, we need to have both machinery and other resources there, right? Or do we put machinery in the Methods section?
Si nos fijamos en http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php/Cantr_II_Wiki:Sandbox/page5 y la sección para la fabricación, tenemos que tener tanto la maquinaria y otros recursos, ¿no? ¿O poner la maquinaria en la sección de métodos? --EchoMan 12:49, 25 February 2010 (GMT)
- Never mind, I got it now. Thanks! :) --EchoMan 12:56, 25 February 2010 (GMT)
Is it possible to alter table rows in the tables in templates? So, e.g.:
| Methods of manufacturing | Amount |
|---|---|
| oven (400g pastry dough, 150g sugar, 30g wood) |
550 |
| coal oven (480g pastry dough, 180g sugar, 30g coal) |
660 |
| coal oven (480g pastry dough, 180g sugar, 55g charcoal) |
660 |
| gas oven (800g pastry dough, 300g sugar, 20g propane) |
1100 |
It would also be nice if the Amount-column was right aligned. What do you think? --EchoMan 13:58, 13 April 2010 (IST)
- That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat| and so on. --EchoMan 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST)
- I think you misunderstand me. I would like this for existing templates (Resources mainly), not a new template. We would have to edit all articles again to use this new template, while if we could set background color on method1, amount1, method3, amount3 and so on, it would solve the problem. I think it would be good if new templates looked as much as the old ones as possible. It's really a nuciance to have to change every article to method0 instead of method1 etc. :) --EchoMan 08:46, 15 April 2010 (IST)
- Sorry, my mistake. I was tired and stressed. It looks very good now. :) --EchoMan 14:02, 16 April 2010 (IST)
- I think you misunderstand me. I would like this for existing templates (Resources mainly), not a new template. We would have to edit all articles again to use this new template, while if we could set background color on method1, amount1, method3, amount3 and so on, it would solve the problem. I think it would be good if new templates looked as much as the old ones as possible. It's really a nuciance to have to change every article to method0 instead of method1 etc. :) --EchoMan 08:46, 15 April 2010 (IST)
Deleting redirect pages
Hi! Could you please make sure that the links are corrected before marking a redirect page for deletion? 'What links here' shouldn't have any resulting pages. Thanks! :) --EchoMan 09:57, 18 May 2010 (IST)
Re:Vehicle template
Hi. I am updating the vechicles to the new format with the stackable infoboxes as in the new template. The old bike had a parameter called single with a number like a weight after it. Please, do you know what this is in the new template? Thankyou, --addicted 15:07, 16 December 2010 (GMT)
Thankyou that was clear. But I'm not sure what you mean by merging - (If you are updating the template "Infobox:Land vehicle", keep in mind that you could take the opportunity to merge it with the template "Infobox:Ship"). The two infobox templates (ship and land vehicle) are the same. Please look at Bike and see if it is correct. Thanks. --addicted 01:32, 17 December 2010 (GMT)
