Difference between revisions of "User talk:Altotn"
(→Re: New template) |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
It would also be nice if the Amount-column was right aligned. What do you think? --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 13:58, 13 April 2010 (IST) | It would also be nice if the Amount-column was right aligned. What do you think? --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 13:58, 13 April 2010 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat| and so on. --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST) | ||
Revision as of 06:18, 14 April 2010
Re: Interwiki
That works great. Thanks for your help. Now lets see if I have the energy to add it everywhere. :) --EchoMan 11:58, 5 February 2010 (GMT)
Re: New template
If you look at http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php/Cantr_II_Wiki:Sandbox/page5 and the section for Manufacturing, we need to have both machinery and other resources there, right? Or do we put machinery in the Methods section?
Si nos fijamos en http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php/Cantr_II_Wiki:Sandbox/page5 y la sección para la fabricación, tenemos que tener tanto la maquinaria y otros recursos, ¿no? ¿O poner la maquinaria en la sección de métodos? --EchoMan 12:49, 25 February 2010 (GMT)
- Never mind, I got it now. Thanks! :) --EchoMan 12:56, 25 February 2010 (GMT)
Is it possible to alter table rows in the tables in templates? So, e.g.:
| Methods of manufacturing | Amount |
|---|---|
| oven (400g pastry dough, 150g sugar, 30g wood) |
550 |
| coal oven (480g pastry dough, 180g sugar, 30g coal) |
660 |
| coal oven (480g pastry dough, 180g sugar, 55g charcoal) |
660 |
| gas oven (800g pastry dough, 300g sugar, 20g propane) |
1100 |
It would also be nice if the Amount-column was right aligned. What do you think? --EchoMan 13:58, 13 April 2010 (IST)
- That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat| and so on. --EchoMan 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST)
