Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unana"
From Cantr II Wiki
m |
Jos Elkink (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: No, that's fair enough. I was attempting to show the active editing community that we appreciate the work they're putting in. This really should go in 'Community portal', which as Sho suggested "the idea is that the "wiki community" means the people who go there often and edit", with reference to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_Portal Wikipedia version]. And just for clarity, do you debate its placement here, or that ''and'' its existence? -- [[User:Kabl00ey|Kabl00ey]] 21:22, 3 Nov 2005 (EST) | : No, that's fair enough. I was attempting to show the active editing community that we appreciate the work they're putting in. This really should go in 'Community portal', which as Sho suggested "the idea is that the "wiki community" means the people who go there often and edit", with reference to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_Portal Wikipedia version]. And just for clarity, do you debate its placement here, or that ''and'' its existence? -- [[User:Kabl00ey|Kabl00ey]] 21:22, 3 Nov 2005 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I don't think it's very useful, so in that sense I was debating it's existence, but I don't really care one way or the other. The placement was my main objection. --[[User:Jos Elkink|Jos Elkink]] 13:49, 5 Nov 2005 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:49, 5 November 2005
Is this top-ten really necessary? I think it's pointless information and definitely not main page stuff ... why not move it to 'current events' or something? Or to a page about the Wiki? --Jos Elkink 05:51, 3 Nov 2005 (EST)
- No, that's fair enough. I was attempting to show the active editing community that we appreciate the work they're putting in. This really should go in 'Community portal', which as Sho suggested "the idea is that the "wiki community" means the people who go there often and edit", with reference to the Wikipedia version. And just for clarity, do you debate its placement here, or that and its existence? -- Kabl00ey 21:22, 3 Nov 2005 (EST)
- I don't think it's very useful, so in that sense I was debating it's existence, but I don't really care one way or the other. The placement was my main objection. --Jos Elkink 13:49, 5 Nov 2005 (EST)
