Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unana"
(→Categories and templates) |
(Agglomeration vs. subdivision) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
It would make things a lot neater if we could use categories and templates to standardize the presentation of items and such. Virtually all of the information in here right now is begging to be categorized. I can't do it myself, not having any experience actually creating those, but does anyone else? [[User:Sho|Sho]] | It would make things a lot neater if we could use categories and templates to standardize the presentation of items and such. Virtually all of the information in here right now is begging to be categorized. I can't do it myself, not having any experience actually creating those, but does anyone else? [[User:Sho|Sho]] | ||
* I'm putting the vehicles in a category system. This will eventually mean tearing down the [[Vehicle]] page, but for now I'll just make nondestructive changes. [[User:Sho|Sho]] | * I'm putting the vehicles in a category system. This will eventually mean tearing down the [[Vehicle]] page, but for now I'll just make nondestructive changes. [[User:Sho|Sho]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Agglomeration vs. subdivision == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Some categories of items, such as [[tools]], have all of their elements listed on the same page. Others, such as [[resources]], have separate pages for everything. My gut instinct (as a Wikipedian) is to split everything into separate pages and use categories to tie them together, but I can see why we might want to keep things in big metapages - it's similar to the format found in IC guides, often the individual data aren't big enough for individual articles, and it would be loads of unrewarding data-entry grunt work. Anyone have any opinion? [[User:Sho|Sho]] | ||
Revision as of 04:22, 16 August 2005
Do you think maybe the different languages ought to have different wikis, instead of being on the same pages?
--Nick Roberts 20:30, 12 Jul 2005 (EDT)
I agree. --Creepyguyinblack 04:50, 13 Jul 2005 (EDT)
I changed it.
--Jos Elkink 05:08, 13 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Categories and templates
It would make things a lot neater if we could use categories and templates to standardize the presentation of items and such. Virtually all of the information in here right now is begging to be categorized. I can't do it myself, not having any experience actually creating those, but does anyone else? Sho
- I'm putting the vehicles in a category system. This will eventually mean tearing down the Vehicle page, but for now I'll just make nondestructive changes. Sho
Agglomeration vs. subdivision
Some categories of items, such as tools, have all of their elements listed on the same page. Others, such as resources, have separate pages for everything. My gut instinct (as a Wikipedian) is to split everything into separate pages and use categories to tie them together, but I can see why we might want to keep things in big metapages - it's similar to the format found in IC guides, often the individual data aren't big enough for individual articles, and it would be loads of unrewarding data-entry grunt work. Anyone have any opinion? Sho
