Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tools"
From Cantr II Wiki
Joshuamonkey (talk | contribs) |
m |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*Should I add the information from this page onto the individual pages for the items? [[User:Joshuamonkey|Joshuamonkey]] 22:39, 10 Mar 2006 (EST) | *Should I add the information from this page onto the individual pages for the items? [[User:Joshuamonkey|Joshuamonkey]] 22:39, 10 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
+ | **Yes, that would be good. [[User:Sho|Sho]] 22:40, 10 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Deleting this page and redirecting to [[:Category:Tools]] as it should be. [[User:Ceselb|Ceselb]] 13:13, 17 February 2007 (EST) | ||
+ | *Descriptions have now been moved to individual pages. [[User:Sho|Sho]] 14:55, 17 February 2007 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 19:55, 17 February 2007
Ugh... this looks ugly. I'll get around to changing this soon.
--Nick Roberts 01:38, 14 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Actually, I think we should leave this for easy reference to create pages for each individual tool. I'll start on that, but eventually this thing should go. It's not very wiki-like.
--Nick Roberts 06:31, 14 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Yeah that's pretty ugly, not to mention pretty incomplete. --Nathan 15:37, 22 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Attempted to make it similar to the machinary list, but in the process forgot to add the links to the individual pages after finishing. Ugh. More harm than good. Maybe a category listing is better?
- Should I add the information from this page onto the individual pages for the items? Joshuamonkey 22:39, 10 Mar 2006 (EST)
- Yes, that would be good. Sho 22:40, 10 Mar 2006 (EST)
Deleting this page and redirecting to Category:Tools as it should be. Ceselb 13:13, 17 February 2007 (EST)
- Descriptions have now been moved to individual pages. Sho 14:55, 17 February 2007 (EST)