User talk:EchoMan - Revision history

EchoMan at 10:36, 12 December 2012

2012-12-12T10:36:31Z

FaithClon: Vestimenta Category

2012-12-12T07:32:22Z

Vestimenta Category

Viktor: /* overlapping infoboxes */

2011-02-12T05:16:20Z

‎overlapping infoboxes

Viktor: /* New USE for old Templates */

2011-02-12T05:16:01Z

‎New USE for old Templates

Viktor: /* New USE for old Templates */

2011-02-12T05:15:40Z

‎New USE for old Templates

Viktor: /* overlapping infoboxes */

2011-01-31T06:31:15Z

‎overlapping infoboxes

Viktor: /* overlapping infoboxes */

2011-01-31T00:17:34Z

‎overlapping infoboxes

Paulwratt: New USE for old Templates

2011-01-30T13:27:29Z

New USE for old Templates

Viktor: overlapping infoboxes

2011-01-29T20:09:45Z

overlapping infoboxes

Paulwratt: Item Stat Updates

2011-01-29T10:58:58Z

Item Stat Updates

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == New templates ==
@@ Line 60: / Line 50: @@
 == overlapping infoboxes ==
-sorry for removing the stack(st) but it was the only way i was able to see all the boxes, as they all overlap and a lot of information is blocked, is there some other way i can get the full view of all the infoboxes without overlap (without downloading a new browser)?
+sorry for removing the stack(st) but it was the only way i was able to see all the boxes, as they all overlap and a lot of information is blocked, is there some other way i can get the full view of all the infoboxes without overlap (without dl'ing a new browser)?
-no problem, my browser is internet explorer, and it is on a dell with XP, (same i've been using all these years :P  )
+no problem, my browser is IE, and it is on a dell with XP, (same i've been using all these years :P  )
 i should also mention, this has only been an issue since the game came back up from the weeks of downtime after the hacking
@@ Line 72: / Line 62: @@
 There is a way to reuse some of the old templates, simply by not providing output. A lot of the old templates have valid category and subcategory inserts, which, if modified to NOT output a table, can still be used to organise sub categories. Example - Storage By Capaity (which can not use regular sortname= because that affects the regular categories --[[User:Paulwratt|Paul]] 2:30, 21 January 2011 (GMT+12)
 == Vestimenta Category ==
 Hello! Yes, all the confección items belong to this category. I never thought into change the template! I have to repair them because most of the articles don't have the interwiki or don't exist, but It would certainly be much easier add the category to the template than add all one by one. If you could add the category to the template I'll be very very grateful, because the infoboxes don't like me too much! :P --[[User:FaithClon|Faith]] 07:32, 12 December 2012 (GMT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:32, 12 December 2012
Line 72:		Line 72:

	There is a way to reuse some of the old templates, simply by not providing output. A lot of the old templates have valid category and subcategory inserts, which, if modified to NOT output a table, can still be used to organise sub categories. Example - Storage By Capaity (which can not use regular sortname= because that affects the regular categories --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 2:30, 21 January 2011 (GMT+12)		There is a way to reuse some of the old templates, simply by not providing output. A lot of the old templates have valid category and subcategory inserts, which, if modified to NOT output a table, can still be used to organise sub categories. Example - Storage By Capaity (which can not use regular sortname= because that affects the regular categories --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 2:30, 21 January 2011 (GMT+12)
		+
		+	== Vestimenta Category ==
		+
		+	Hello! Yes, all the confección items belong to this category. I never thought into change the template! I have to repair them because most of the articles don't have the interwiki or don't exist, but It would certainly be much easier add the category to the template than add all one by one. If you could add the category to the template I'll be very very grateful, because the infoboxes don't like me too much! :P --[[User:FaithClon\|Faith]] 07:32, 12 December 2012 (GMT)

@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 i should also mention, this has only been an issue since the game came back up from the weeks of downtime after the hacking
 == New USE for old Templates ==
 There is a way to reuse some of the old templates, simply by not providing output. A lot of the old templates have valid category and subcategory inserts, which, if modified to NOT output a table, can still be used to organise sub categories. Example - Storage By Capaity (which can not use regular sortname= because that affects the regular categories --[[User:Paulwratt|Paul]] 2:30, 21 January 2011 (GMT+12)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:16, 12 February 2011
Line 69:		Line 69:

	There is a way to reuse some of the old templates, simply by not providing output. A lot of the old templates have valid category and subcategory inserts, which, if modified to NOT output a table, can still be used to organise sub categories. Example - Storage By Capaity (which can not use regular sortname= because that affects the regular categories --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 2:30, 21 January 2011 (GMT+12)		There is a way to reuse some of the old templates, simply by not providing output. A lot of the old templates have valid category and subcategory inserts, which, if modified to NOT output a table, can still be used to organise sub categories. Example - Storage By Capaity (which can not use regular sortname= because that affects the regular categories --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 2:30, 21 January 2011 (GMT+12)
−
−	HEY!!!!! i found something that will help, i looked at the weapons, the steel longsword i hve the overlapping problem, BUT the bronze longsword is displaying the way it should be and i noticed it is using a different type of code instad of the st stack

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 12 February 2011
Line 69:		Line 69:

	There is a way to reuse some of the old templates, simply by not providing output. A lot of the old templates have valid category and subcategory inserts, which, if modified to NOT output a table, can still be used to organise sub categories. Example - Storage By Capaity (which can not use regular sortname= because that affects the regular categories --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 2:30, 21 January 2011 (GMT+12)		There is a way to reuse some of the old templates, simply by not providing output. A lot of the old templates have valid category and subcategory inserts, which, if modified to NOT output a table, can still be used to organise sub categories. Example - Storage By Capaity (which can not use regular sortname= because that affects the regular categories --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 2:30, 21 January 2011 (GMT+12)
		+
		+	HEY!!!!! i found something that will help, i looked at the weapons, the steel longsword i hve the overlapping problem, BUT the bronze longsword is displaying the way it should be and i noticed it is using a different type of code instad of the st stack

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:27, 30 January 2011
Line 61:		Line 61:

	sorry for removing the stack(st) but it was the only way i was able to see all the boxes, as they all overlap and a lot of information is blocked, is there some other way i can get the full view of all the infoboxes without overlap (without downloading a new browser)?		sorry for removing the stack(st) but it was the only way i was able to see all the boxes, as they all overlap and a lot of information is blocked, is there some other way i can get the full view of all the infoboxes without overlap (without downloading a new browser)?
		+
		+	== New USE for old Templates ==
		+
		+	There is a way to reuse some of the old templates, simply by not providing output. A lot of the old templates have valid category and subcategory inserts, which, if modified to NOT output a table, can still be used to organise sub categories. Example - Storage By Capaity (which can not use regular sortname= because that affects the regular categories --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 2:30, 21 January 2011 (GMT+12)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 29 January 2011
Line 57:		Line 57:

	I used the info from [[Recent database changes - Objects]], and from the announcements thread on the forum. Thanks for the info on InterWiki templates --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 23:49, 29 January 2011 (GMT+12)		I used the info from [[Recent database changes - Objects]], and from the announcements thread on the forum. Thanks for the info on InterWiki templates --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 23:49, 29 January 2011 (GMT+12)
		+
		+	== overlapping infoboxes ==
		+
		+	sorry for removing the stack(st) but it was the only way i was able to see all the boxes, as they all overlap and a lot of information is blocked, is there some other way i can get the full view of all the infoboxes without overlap (without downloading a new browser)?

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:58, 29 January 2011
Line 53:		Line 53:

	the resting state addition to resting furniture was just for convenience. --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 21:57, 23 January 2011 (GMT+12)		the resting state addition to resting furniture was just for convenience. --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 21:57, 23 January 2011 (GMT+12)
		+
		+	== Item Stat Updates ==
		+
		+	I used the info from [[Recent database changes - Objects]], and from the announcements thread on the forum. Thanks for the info on InterWiki templates --[[User:Paulwratt\|Paul]] 23:49, 29 January 2011 (GMT+12)