User talk:Altotn - Revision history

Addicted at 01:32, 17 December 2010

2010-12-17T01:32:25Z

Addicted at 15:07, 16 December 2010

2010-12-16T15:07:00Z

EchoMan at 08:57, 18 May 2010

2010-05-18T08:57:49Z

EchoMan at 13:02, 16 April 2010

2010-04-16T13:02:35Z

EchoMan at 07:48, 15 April 2010

2010-04-15T07:48:16Z

EchoMan at 07:46, 15 April 2010

2010-04-15T07:46:33Z

EchoMan: /* Re: New template */

2010-04-14T06:18:14Z

‎Re: New template

EchoMan at 12:58, 13 April 2010

2010-04-13T12:58:54Z

EchoMan: /* Re: New template */

2010-02-25T12:56:39Z

‎Re: New template

EchoMan at 12:49, 25 February 2010

2010-02-25T12:49:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:32, 17 December 2010
Line 43:		Line 43:
	The old bike had a parameter called single with a number like a weight after it. Please, do you know what this is in the new template?		The old bike had a parameter called single with a number like a weight after it. Please, do you know what this is in the new template?
	Thankyou, --[[User:Addicted\|addicted]] 15:07, 16 December 2010 (GMT)		Thankyou, --[[User:Addicted\|addicted]] 15:07, 16 December 2010 (GMT)
		+
		+	Thankyou that was clear. But I'm not sure what you mean by merging - (If you are updating the template "Infobox:Land vehicle", keep in mind that you could take the opportunity to merge it with the template "Infobox:Ship"). The two infobox templates (ship and land vehicle) are the same. Please look at Bike and see if it is correct. Thanks. --[[User:Addicted\|addicted]] 01:32, 17 December 2010 (GMT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:07, 16 December 2010
Line 37:		Line 37:
	==Deleting redirect pages==		==Deleting redirect pages==
	Hi! Could you please make sure that the links are corrected before marking a redirect page for deletion? 'What links here' shouldn't have any resulting pages. Thanks! :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 09:57, 18 May 2010 (IST)		Hi! Could you please make sure that the links are corrected before marking a redirect page for deletion? 'What links here' shouldn't have any resulting pages. Thanks! :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 09:57, 18 May 2010 (IST)
		+
		+	==Re:Vehicle template==
		+	Hi.
		+	I am updating the vechicles to the new format with the stackable infoboxes as in the new template.
		+	The old bike had a parameter called single with a number like a weight after it. Please, do you know what this is in the new template?
		+	Thankyou, --[[User:Addicted\|addicted]] 15:07, 16 December 2010 (GMT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 18 May 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:: I think you misunderstand me. I would like this for existing templates (Resources mainly), not a new template. We would have to edit all articles again to use this new template, while if we could set background color on method1, amount1, method3, amount3 and so on, it would solve the problem. I think it would be good if new templates looked as much as the old ones as possible. It's really a nuciance to have to change every article to method0 instead of method1 etc. :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 08:46, 15 April 2010 (IST)		:: I think you misunderstand me. I would like this for existing templates (Resources mainly), not a new template. We would have to edit all articles again to use this new template, while if we could set background color on method1, amount1, method3, amount3 and so on, it would solve the problem. I think it would be good if new templates looked as much as the old ones as possible. It's really a nuciance to have to change every article to method0 instead of method1 etc. :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 08:46, 15 April 2010 (IST)
	::: Sorry, my mistake. I was tired and stressed. It looks very good now. :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 14:02, 16 April 2010 (IST)		::: Sorry, my mistake. I was tired and stressed. It looks very good now. :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 14:02, 16 April 2010 (IST)
		+
		+	==Deleting redirect pages==
		+	Hi! Could you please make sure that the links are corrected before marking a redirect page for deletion? 'What links here' shouldn't have any resulting pages. Thanks! :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 09:57, 18 May 2010 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 16 April 2010
Line 33:		Line 33:
	: That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat\| and so on. --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST)		: That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat\| and so on. --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST)
	:: I think you misunderstand me. I would like this for existing templates (Resources mainly), not a new template. We would have to edit all articles again to use this new template, while if we could set background color on method1, amount1, method3, amount3 and so on, it would solve the problem. I think it would be good if new templates looked as much as the old ones as possible. It's really a nuciance to have to change every article to method0 instead of method1 etc. :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 08:46, 15 April 2010 (IST)		:: I think you misunderstand me. I would like this for existing templates (Resources mainly), not a new template. We would have to edit all articles again to use this new template, while if we could set background color on method1, amount1, method3, amount3 and so on, it would solve the problem. I think it would be good if new templates looked as much as the old ones as possible. It's really a nuciance to have to change every article to method0 instead of method1 etc. :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 08:46, 15 April 2010 (IST)
		+	::: Sorry, my mistake. I was tired and stressed. It looks very good now. :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 14:02, 16 April 2010 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:48, 15 April 2010
Line 32:		Line 32:

	: That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat\| and so on. --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST)		: That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat\| and so on. --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST)
−	:: I think you misunderstand me. I would like this for existing templates (Resources mainly), not a new template. We would have to edit all articles again to use this new template, while if we could set background color on method1, amount1, method3, amount3 and so on, it would solve the problem. --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 08:46, 15 April 2010 (IST)	+	:: I think you misunderstand me. I would like this for existing templates (Resources mainly), not a new template. We would have to edit all articles again to use this new template, while if we could set background color on method1, amount1, method3, amount3 and so on, it would solve the problem. I think it would be good if new templates looked as much as the old ones as possible. It's really a nuciance to have to change every article to method0 instead of method1 etc. :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 08:46, 15 April 2010 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:46, 15 April 2010
Line 32:		Line 32:

	: That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat\| and so on. --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST)		: That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat\| and so on. --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST)
		+	:: I think you misunderstand me. I would like this for existing templates (Resources mainly), not a new template. We would have to edit all articles again to use this new template, while if we could set background color on method1, amount1, method3, amount3 and so on, it would solve the problem. --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 08:46, 15 April 2010 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:18, 14 April 2010
Line 30:		Line 30:

	It would also be nice if the Amount-column was right aligned. What do you think? --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 13:58, 13 April 2010 (IST)		It would also be nice if the Amount-column was right aligned. What do you think? --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 13:58, 13 April 2010 (IST)
		+
		+	: That's all. :) I think Method column doesn't have to be two lines, if we want to have resources there we can do like: method0= oven BR 100g coal, 500g meat\| and so on. --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 07:18, 14 April 2010 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 13 April 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	--[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 12:49, 25 February 2010 (GMT)		--[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 12:49, 25 February 2010 (GMT)
	: Never mind, I got it now. Thanks! :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 12:56, 25 February 2010 (GMT)		: Never mind, I got it now. Thanks! :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 12:56, 25 February 2010 (GMT)
		+	----
		+	Is it possible to alter table rows in the tables in templates? So, e.g.:
		+
		+	{\| border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 style="border-collapse:collapse" width="400px"
		+	\|- bgcolor=#cff
		+	! Methods of manufacturing !! Amount
		+	\|-bgcolor=#fff
		+	\| [[oven]]<br />(400g [[pastry dough]], 150g [[sugar]], 30g [[wood]])
		+	\| 550
		+	\|-bgcolor=#eee
		+	\| [[coal oven]]<br />(480g [[pastry dough]], 180g [[sugar]], 30g [[coal]])
		+	\| 660
		+	\|-bgcolor=#fff
		+	\| [[coal oven]]<br />(480g [[pastry dough]], 180g [[sugar]], 55g [[charcoal]])
		+	\| 660
		+	\|-bgcolor=#eee
		+	\| [[gas oven]]<br />(800g [[pastry dough]], 300g [[sugar]], 20g [[propane]])
		+	\| 1100
		+	\|}
		+
		+
		+	It would also be nice if the Amount-column was right aligned. What do you think? --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 13:58, 13 April 2010 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 25 February 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Si nos fijamos en http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php/Cantr_II_Wiki:Sandbox/page5 y la sección para la fabricación, tenemos que tener tanto la maquinaria y otros recursos, ¿no? ¿O poner la maquinaria en la sección de métodos?		Si nos fijamos en http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php/Cantr_II_Wiki:Sandbox/page5 y la sección para la fabricación, tenemos que tener tanto la maquinaria y otros recursos, ¿no? ¿O poner la maquinaria en la sección de métodos?
	--[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 12:49, 25 February 2010 (GMT)		--[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 12:49, 25 February 2010 (GMT)
		+	: Never mind, I got it now. Thanks! :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 12:56, 25 February 2010 (GMT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:49, 25 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Re: Interwiki==		==Re: Interwiki==
	That works great. Thanks for your help. Now lets see if I have the energy to add it everywhere. :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 11:58, 5 February 2010 (GMT)		That works great. Thanks for your help. Now lets see if I have the energy to add it everywhere. :) --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 11:58, 5 February 2010 (GMT)
		+
		+	==Re: New template==
		+	If you look at http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php/Cantr_II_Wiki:Sandbox/page5 and the section for Manufacturing, we need to have both machinery and other resources there, right? Or do we put machinery in the Methods section?
		+	----
		+	Si nos fijamos en http://wiki.cantr.net/index.php/Cantr_II_Wiki:Sandbox/page5 y la sección para la fabricación, tenemos que tener tanto la maquinaria y otros recursos, ¿no? ¿O poner la maquinaria en la sección de métodos?
		+	--[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 12:49, 25 February 2010 (GMT)